Currently (Re-) Reading: The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien
The “Currently Re-Reading” section today is technically not
true… I’m not sure I can say “currently” if I haven’t actually cracked the book
open yet. I guess I’m in book limbo since I just finished 1984 last night and haven’t started The Hobbit yet. Either way, here’s hoping I finish re-reading it
before the movie comes out.
I have a second somewhat tangential topic to discuss before
diving into my A Clockwork Orange experience.
Between Jane Eyre and A Clockwork Orange, I actually read two
other books. These books were pseudo sequels to one of my all-time favorite
novels, The Shadow of the Wind. They
center on the same characters and the same mysterious library called the
Cemetery of Forgotten Books in Barcelona, but supposedly they can stand alone
i.e. you don’t have to read the others to understand or enjoy one of them. Following
The Shadow of the Wind, the author,
Carlos Ruiz Zafon, wrote The Angel’s
Game and The Prisoner of Heaven.
After reading all about the epic romance of the passionately moral Jane Eyre, I
thus entered the mysterious, dangerous streets of Barcelona with the tormented
David Martin in The Angel’s Game and
then The Prisoner of Heaven.
I’ve opted not to dedicate an entire blog post to either of
these Zafon novels, despite how thoroughly I enjoyed them because the topics I
wanted to discuss would have revealed far too much about these
keep-you-guessing, twisted stories. I’ve used spoiler alerts, but I don’t know
how effective they are and frankly, most of the time I expect the people
reading my blog to have already read what I’m discussing since they are classic
English class reading. With The Angel’s
Game and The Prisoner of Heaven,
I don’t expect as high a readership and I absolutely would not want to ruin
these books because if you haven’t read them or The Shadow of the Wind, you definitely should. They are gorgeously
written and are intriguing, compelling, lovely, and disturbing stories with
lots of surprise twists. I would hate to deprive anyone of the experience of
reading them without knowing what will come next.
That being said, if you have read any or all of these books,
I would love, love, love to discuss them!
Moving on…
WARNING: this post contains spoilers for A Clockwork Orange. If you haven’t read
it, you should probably stop reading.
Now, there is a reason I mentioned the Carlos Ruiz Zafon
novels even though I don’t intend to spend a full post on them. Besides wanting
to recommend them to the world, these books definitely colored my reading of A Clockwork Orange.
Allow me to elaborate.
With most popular or classic novels, it’s hard not to hear something about them before reading
them. In the case of A Clockwork Orange,
everything I heard about it was how disturbing a story it was. I was actually
fairly nervous about reading it because I don’t have the strongest of stomachs
nor do I have nerves of steel. Therefore, I was convinced that A Clockwork Orange would be more than I
could handle, pathetic a confession as that may be.
However, I was both relieved and disappointed to discover
that it didn’t live up to my gruesome expectations.
I firmly believe that I wasn’t as appalled as most by the
atrocious acts in A Clockwork Orange because
I had just finished The Angel’s Game and
The Prisoner of Heaven. Crazy as it
may seem, Carlos Ruiz Zafon’s story was so twisted and messed with my head so
much that Anthony Burgess could hardly top it. However, I don’t know if this
was one of those instances in which the reality couldn’t possibly live up to
the horrible imaginings I had envisioned or if I was somewhat robbed of the
real experience of reading A Clockwork
Orange.
Admittedly, A
Clockwork Orange was really disturbing, even if my previous reading
lessened the level of disturbance. What surprised me was that it wasn’t so much
the gratuitous violence and sexual abuse that appears primarily at the start of
the novel that was upsetting. I mean, it was upsetting, but the truly
disturbing part of the story was the idea driving the protagonist’s
“reformation.”
In some ways, the theory behind the protagonist’s tortuous
process of “reform” sounds reasonable. Plus, the end result is certainly
desirable. I mean, why is it so unreasonable to condition a person in such a
way that they are physically ill at the sight or even the mention of violence
or depravity? After all, isn’t that the “normal” reaction of a person we would
consider sane? And it’s just an intense learning technique, right? Why is this
so much more horrible than something like putting foul-tasting nail polish on
to condition yourself to stop biting your nails? Plus, don’t the ends justify
the means? The end result, in theory, is a peace-loving society that literally
finds brutality and aggression revolting; everyone would behave like a “good”
person in this world.
So where’s the bad?
Sure, it all sounds great… until you find out more about the
means to the end. The method of “reformation” is both horrifying and
dehumanizing. The reformers strap the person being reformed into a chair and
restrain him entirely, including his eyelids, and then force him to watch the
most awful, gruesome images available while he’s induced with a medicine that
makes him physically ill to the point of torture. The reformers condition the
reformed to a point where he will castrate himself at the foot of an aggressor
rather than fight or even think about fighting. He’s in so much anguish that he
literally throws himself out the window to escape his torment.
Is this really a solution? And more importantly, if someone
simply behaves well in society out of a desire to avoid physical pain rather
than out of a desire to behave well and do good things, is he really considered
a good person? What makes someone good? The good actions/lack of bad actions he
does or the choice he makes to do those actions? It’s a fascinating question to
examine and I think Anthony Burgess does a great job looking at all the angles.
One of the most interesting and controversial components of A Clockwork Orange, though, is actually
connected to this integral question. This is the final chapter of the novel.
As some may know, the final chapter of the book was not included in the American publication
of it. Weirdly, the movie adaptation of the novel was based on this incomplete
version despite the fact that the director was British, so many people believe
that this was how the book was intended to end. The final chapter was also another
aspect of the novel I’d heard about and that turned out to be quite the
surprise for me. I’d always heard that the final chapter completely changes the
message of the whole book and this is, in fact, true. What stunned me, though,
was that I firmly expected the extra chapter to leave the novel with a
depressing and dark ending and that the American version left it out because it
was too awful to subject the more conservative American population to. I
honestly always thought the final chapter was the reason for all the censorship
of the book.
I could not have been more wrong. In fact, the final chapter
was completely the opposite of what I expected. Instead of leaving the reader
with a dark, gloomy feeling like A Brave
New World, the final chapter proposes a more positive outlook on life.
Without the final chapter, people are fundamentally evil and there’s no hope of
changing them. With it, an obsession with violence and aggression is simply a
childish pursuit and eventually people grow up and recognize the fundamental
goodness that’s been dormant in them until then.
I was so surprised that the American editor thought the book
was better without it!
Finally, I have to say that I’m surprised this whole post
wasn’t mean ranting about the made up slang. Although it initially read like a
MadLib gone terribly wrong, I really did get used to it and actually came to
find it impressive. So don’t let it turn you off to the book!
No comments:
Post a Comment